Posts: 82
Threads: 13
Joined: Jan 2021
Reputation:
1
Kinda like prayer, what's the harm. . . .
Posts: 410
Threads: 177
Joined: Jan 2021
Reputation:
24
Tremendous harm, if you mean "produce". Â Production is running at full blast and resources are being diverted to the current vaccines.
By my calculation, Moderna & Pfizer will just barely cover Phase 1A and 65+, with all that has been (pre) purchased and expected delivery by July 31. Â Take away production from those and people will die from the current COVID. Â Reduce the delivery of vaccinations now, and more variants will spring forth before we can get herd immunity for the current virus variants.
If you mean "test", are you thinking that we stop the current testing on 12-16yo so they can be approved some day?
If you mean "design", that may be ok, but it took most of a year to get the current two vaccines approved and into production. Â It will have to go through design, and then 3 phases of testing, EUA, and production.
Posts: 82
Threads: 13
Joined: Jan 2021
Reputation:
1
All the production and distribution issues will be resolved tomorrow. A friend is the chief of staff for an influential dem in the Bay Area, and he assured me so just today. As cynical as I am, I hope he’s right.
Posts: 77
Threads: 6
Joined: Jan 2021
Reputation:
2
M_T:
I do not see why vaccine production is a zero sum game. I never said to divert resources, I said we should use money to create new capacity.
I do agree that we can not afford to reduce production of current vaccines. The faster we vaccinate, the fewer the deaths, the fewer opportunities to breed new variants.
I do not understand your comment "If you mean "test", are you thinking that we stop the current testing on 12-16yo so they can be approved some day?" because I did not mention the word "test" nor did I discuss 12-16 year olds.
I did, however, comment on the fact that new flu vaccines are introduced yearly. I don't know the time frame, but they clearly don't have phase 3 trials. Decision on the new strain and production take way less than a year. How do they do that? Do they assume safety due to some measure of similarity to a prior flu vaccine? It's a good question because a vaccine designed for a covid variant may benefit from such a thing.
RE "If you mean "design", that may be ok". May be OK? How would this worsen the crisis? How could some scientist developing the next vaccine in a laboratory harm our currently insufficient production capacity.
cardcrimson:
I suppose I am more cynical than you. After the "second doses that were withheld disappearing" I wonder what other skeletons are in our vaccine manufacturing closet.
Posts: 23
Threads: 7
Joined: Jan 2021
Reputation:
0
Maybe just a (social) media echo chamber but more and more comments about the vaccine not lasting for more than a few months or that it won't be effective against new strains.
If either of those are true, it's definitely time to take a look at our vaccine development process and see where we can streamline the process to get faster TAT and production. Otherwise, we'll always be 2 steps behind and never rid of this virus. =(
Posts: 77
Threads: 6
Joined: Jan 2021
Reputation:
2
The worst that can happen is that we construct factories for vials, syringes, bioreactors or whatever, etc that end up operating under utilization. Wait, we should have that!
Posts: 12
Threads: 0
Joined: Jan 2021
Reputation:
0
The vaccines are all going to continue being highly efficacious. A 6 fold reduction in neutralizing antibodies may make zero clinical difference, and antibodies are just one small part of the picture. Your immune system generates a robust response to the whole spike protein so even with several mutations, the vaccines should be in good shape with antibodies and T-cells directed at different parts of the spike protein.
If we did get a bad enough variant, a tweak to the mRNA vaccines would take days to design and could probably be released without a full 30k person trial.